News -> Pooyie!

Pooyie 06.08.11

Wednesday, June 8, 2011

C’EST BON
The state House committee tasked with spending Louisiana’s money got an extra voice from Lafayette last week when Speaker Jim Tucker named Rep. Rickey Hardy to the House Appropriations Committee. Hardy had to resign from the House Commerce Committee to accept the assignment, which he happily did; widely regarded as the most powerful committee in the House, Appropriations deals with the state budget and other fiscal matters. The north Lafayette Democrat joins south-side Republican Page Cortez on the committee. (Rep. Simone Champagne, R-Jeanerette, rounds out an Acadiana trifecta.) This newspaper has given Hardy the business in the past over his sponsorship and co-sponsorship of some questionable legislation — barring senior citizens from seeking office, for one; forcing welfare recipients to pass drug tests, for another — but we’ve never doubted that Hardy is a straight shooter with the best interests of his district at heart.

PAS BON
Louisiana lawmakers proved yet again that deference to industry lobbyists over protecting public health is de rigueur in state politics. A bill that would have banned smoking in bars in Louisiana went up in smoke in the state Senate last week by a 22-15 vote, with Acadiana Sens. Elbert Guillory and Fred Mills joining the pro-carcinogen contingent. (Sen. Mike Michot, R-Lafayette, was absent for the vote.) It was the third such attempt to ban smoking in bars by state Sen. Rob Marionneaux Jr., D-Livonia. The bill originally included casinos in the ban — the legislation aimed to protect bartenders, waitresses, musicians and others who work in bars and casinos from the deleterious effects of second-hand smoke — but that component was stripped from the bill in a House committee. The ban on smoking in bars, however, did clear the full House. Opponents of the bill argued it would drive smokers and their tax revenue to other states. There may be a tendril of truth to that argument for establishments skirting state lines, although the ban on smoking in restaurants in Lafayette Parish doesn’t seem to have driven diners away. They adapted. The net result of this stupid failure by the Senate is that employees in Louisiana bars and casinos are virtually the only workers not protected by law from a proven environmental carcinogen.

COUILLON
We get the feeling Rep. Jeff Landry, R-New Iberia, is just trying too hard to out-conservative Rep. Charles Boustany, R-Lafayette, Landry’s presumptive opponent in the election next year for the new 3rd Congressional District. Landry’s D.C. press hack, the curiously named Millard Mulé, has been firing off chest-thumping press releases on the freshman congressman’s behalf since Landry took the oath of office in January. One of the most recent, however, raised eyebrows across the political spectrum: a braggadocios bulletin announcing the rep’s refusal to meet with President Barack Obama to discuss the budget impasse. Roughly 200 House Republicans, it’s worth noting, did accept the president’s invitation. The Times-Picayune reported the story last Wednesday, quoting Norm Ornstein of the conservative American Enterprise Institute, who pursed his lips at Landry’s petty posturing: “It is more than a little arrogant,” Ornstein told the Times-Pic. “It belittles the office of the presidency and shows that Landry has little understanding of the political process, the role of the constitutional institutions, much less basic politeness.”



Comments (10)add
...
written by ragin_cajun , June 09, 2011 - 01:28 pm
"proven environmental carcinogen"

Please provide link to your "proof" of that.
...
written by Walter Pierce , June 09, 2011 - 02:17 pm
...
written by ragin_cajun , June 09, 2011 - 08:23 pm
Walter --

Remarks from a five year old press conference, and a 3/4 page write-up from NIOSH saying how they showed that casino workers are being exposed to second hand smoke? That's it?

I concede that casino workers are exposed to more cigarette smoke than other people. The question is, does that increased exposure cause cancer, or increased incidence of respiratory problems?

Interestingly, the very first comment in the NIOSH article you linked to has a vendor discussing a filtration/ventilation system that would address the issue. But that's just not going to be considered by NIOSH. Only a smoking ban will do.

Don't you think that's a little Draconian?
...
written by Walter Pierce , June 09, 2011 - 08:45 pm
There are other links within that documentation as I recall, ragin. The literature is extensive and readily available.
Peer-reviewed studies on the health effects of exposure to secondhand smoke are legion.
If you don't accept the science, you won't be persuaded.
We (by we I mean representative government) ban smoking in all manner of places to prevent secondhand smoke exposure -- schools, government buildings, restaurants, retail operations. Bars and casinos are virtually the lone exception.
The argument by the trade associations that such bans would negatively impact business in bars and casinos is also without merit; the CDC did extensive tracking of retail receipts in such establishments following the imposition of smoking bans and found no impact.
You'll have to track that down yourself. I gotta get back to work.

...
written by ragin_cajun , June 09, 2011 - 08:55 pm
"Peer-reviewed studies on the health effects of exposure to secondhand smoke are legion. "

Peer reviewd studies showing NO effects of exposure to secondhand smoke are legion, too. The "science" is not conclusive.

The fact that representative government bans something proves nothing. Representative government and societal norms have been wrong before. Argumentum ad populum, appeal to numbers, appeal to authority.

That smoking bans would negatively impact business IS without merit, but so what?

There ARE other places where there are no smoking bans--people's homes. Will they try to ban smoking in homes, too? Why ban it in a place at all? Why not just outlaw it altogether?
...
written by Walter Pierce , June 09, 2011 - 09:10 pm
I would venture that for most reasonable, rational people the science is conclusive.
I personally like the fresh, clean scent of agricultural-grade pesticide. I use it at home as a fragrance. Should I be allowed to spray it in a bar, casino or retail store because it's my personal choice?
Beyond the fact that it's rude and boorish, why should smokers be allowed to subject non-smokers to their noxious fumes in a bar or casino? Because that's the way it's always been? Well, what about we pesticide inhalers? We have rights, too.
I declare, my contrarian friend, you will argue about anything.
Full disclosure: I'm a smoker.
...
written by ragin_cajun , June 09, 2011 - 10:38 pm
You're right! Walter you're a genius! There is no law preventing a person from spraying pesticides in a public place! Quick! I'll meet you at Page Cortez' office first thing tomorrow morning and we will INSIST that he introduce a law banning that social I'll as well.

Sorry, Walter. If second hand smoke were enough to cause cancer, then surely first hand smoke would kill a person quicker than it does. If your addiction to cigarettes and pesticides hasn't killed you by now, how dangerous could casual and occassional exposure really be?

And I will not argue about anything. There are things I will not even discuss. For example, abortion and religion are issues that no one can discuss rationally, so I stat out of those. Red Sox versus Yankees is another one I won't argue about. And I won't even dignify with a response any suggestion that Rocky Marciano isn't the greatest heavyweight of all time.
...
written by rambeaux rawlings , June 09, 2011 - 10:52 pm
Give up Walter. You're living in Louisiana, "The Smokers' Paradise." Where smoking is cheap and inconveniencing addicts or affecting the cash flow of casinos and convenience stores takes precedence over the health of innocent bystanders. Breath it or leave it.
...
written by ragin_cajun , June 10, 2011 - 11:45 am
What about ventilation and filtration?! Why is a ban the ONLY acceptable option?!
...
written by ragin_cajun , June 10, 2011 - 07:29 pm
Static. Radio silence.
You must be logged in to post a comment. Log in using your Facebook account or register if you do not have an account yet.

busy 
Advertisement

Read the Flipping Paper!

Click Here for the Entire Print Version of
IND Monthly
Most Read
Advertisement
Advertisement
in case you missed it