News -> Pooyie!

Pooyie 06.29.2011

Wednesday, June 29, 2011
Written by The Independent Staff

C’EST BON
It was a textbook case of protecting and serving when The Advocate obtained and posted online video of the January 2010 traffic stop that resulted in a drunk driving charge against state Rep. Bobby Badon, D-Carencro — a charge that was recently thrown out on a technicality. On the one side you had a nervous, stammering, slurring-his-words Badon trying to protect his reputation and serve his own interests after being pulled over on his way home from a party. On the other was State Trooper James Lazard — composed and professional despite Badon’s name dropping and good-ole-boy appeals for deference to his status and “a little leniency.” Kudos to Lazard for standing his ground and following the law. And ditto to The Advocate for pursuing the public’s right to know.

PAS BON
The kayaker who spotted the body of 29-year-old Cory Sonnier in Lake Martin the morning of June 24 was undoubtedly shaken up by the discovery of an apparent homicide victim. But when The Daily Advertiser tried to interview the unfortunate witness, he didn’t decline because he was too disturbed by what he found; rather, he told the Lafayette daily that he was “instructed by police not to speak with the media.” Since the St. Martin Parish Sheriff’s Office is investigating the case — and said sheriff’s office has been known in the past to give the same “instructions” to other witnesses when newsworthy crimes take place in its jurisdiction — presumably the St. Martin Parish Sheriff’s Office was again the issuer of an illegal gag order. What’s not explained in the daily’s crime story is that no law enforcement agency can prohibit witnesses from talking for the sake of preserving an investigation. That’s thanks to a little protection known as the First Amendment, which specifically gives Americans the freedom to speak about almost anything to Uncle T-Bob, Maw-Maw Barbara, friends and even the media. Also included in the First Amendment is the added protection of a free press, though nowhere in the document did our Founding Fathers outline the importance of a police state. We kindly ask the St. Martin Parish Sheriff’s Office to brush up on its high school civics or Google the term “Bill of Rights.”

COUILLON
Pity poor Washington. The little town that butters its bread with an interstate speed trap just can’t get its act together. The latest exhibit of incompetence came last week when it was learned that the Federal Emergency Management Agency is demanding the St. Landry Parish hamlet return more than $72,000 it was allocated following Hurricane Katrina for housing evacuees. Washington, it turns out, never provided the proper documentation demonstrating how it spent the money and, what’s more, it’s now been two years since the town was notified about the problem. This follows a recent revelation that Washington owes the state $200,000 for speeding tickets issued to motorists who were traveling less than 10 miles over the posted limit on I-49. While Washington Mayor Joseph Pitre, who is black, has suggested his town is the victim of a racially motivated conspiracy, we prefer to think of it as a karma.



Comments (17)add
...
written by BoFred , June 29, 2011 - 10:20 am
I have to admit, if I found a body & I learned it was a murder victim, probably dumped for gators to get rid of, and the law enforcement agency asked me not to speak to the media - just yet - I'd probably have no problem with that. I would want to give that agency every opportunity to solve the case. If it were me, I don't believe MY story of what I did, what I saw, would be the most important immediate concern. I saw the man on TV & I didn't get the impression he was fearful of law enforcement or that he was FORBIDDEN to give details. I got the impression he was disturbed & concerned the victim have every opportunity to have justice. I just didn't get the impression this was a "right to speak" issue, but one of concern by a witness to preserve the initial integrity of the case.
...
written by ragin_cajun , June 29, 2011 - 06:05 pm
Maybe law enforcement can't prohibit witnesses from talking to the press...but is there anything that says law enforcement can't politely ask witnesses to refrain from speaking to the press for any of a number of different reasons? This may come as a shock to the staff of theIND, but there are MANY people who don't LIKE the press, don't trust them to tell the truth, and don't WANT to speak with them. MANY people would much prefer to cooperate with law enforcement than with the press.

If the press would quit acting like political operatives, and quit throwing "free press" tantrums everytime they don't get what they want, maybe that attitude would change. But, based on what I read here, I don't hold out much hope for change.
...
written by Walter Pierce , June 29, 2011 - 06:21 pm
You certainly have no reservations about "speaking to the press," ragin.
;)
...
written by ragin_cajun , June 29, 2011 - 08:09 pm
Well, that's because you're seeing me write here, somewhat anonymously, in character, using a "nom de plume", etc. But in my professional life, I don't speak to reporters unless I see some evidence in print of their ability to express nuanced positions in a clear and unbiased way. Speaking with reporters is incredibly risky and I typically try to avoid it.

Commenting on opinion pieces on the web using a pseudonym...that's not really speaking to the press, now, is it? Once again, there's confusion over what is opinion and what is news?? ;)
...
written by Get Over It, IND! , June 29, 2011 - 10:50 pm
Ragin is speaking to the public, not to "the press" and he's RIGHT! ! ! So, GET OVER IT, IND ! ! !
...
written by Walter Pierce , June 30, 2011 - 12:55 am
Geez "Get over it," the semicolon and closed parentheses at the end of my last comment signifies a wink, as in "kidding bro." Please, at your earliest convenience, take your meds and stop hating on the Wal-man.
...
written by ragin_cajun , June 30, 2011 - 02:12 pm
Walter, I want you to go through the server logs and verify for everyone that "Get Over It, IND" is a different person than I am:) I don't want to be accused of posting twice under different pseudonyms to pump myself up on these boards:) I DO actually have supporters, and my worldview IS held by MANY people out there besides me. Our Republic is not lost, yet.

Oh..and, uh....the "Wal-man"? That's gonna come back to haunt you :)


...
written by Walter Pierce , June 30, 2011 - 02:21 pm
ragin,
I've no idea how to go through server logs and I'm pretty sure that digital fingerprints are not readily apparent when folks like yourself post anonymously and said comments must go through a moderator.
I assumed "Get Over It, IND" was just some disgruntled crank and not you. That's still my assumption.
As for "Wal-man," let's just say I got on-line on wine.
...
written by ragin_cajun , June 30, 2011 - 02:43 pm
"I've no idea how to go through server logs" It's A LOT easier than it sounds. I'll tell you all about it (anonymously of course) if you're interested...which you're probably not. It's not totally conclusive, but you can easily verify that me and Get Over It posted from two different IP addresses, and thus are two different people.

"some disgruntled crank " C'mon Walter. Don't talk about my peeps like that. You trying to start a culture war or something?

"As for "Wal-man," let's just say I got on-line on wine." No problem, I totally understand that...:) I'll even strike it from the record.

I have to say, I'm very impressed that you're a hard-smoking, hard-drinking libertine. In the Hemingway tradition....or the Dorothy Parker tradition? :)
...
written by Dudley E. LaBauve, III , June 30, 2011 - 08:52 pm
Damn Walter, does it feel like someone flicked you in the balls a little. Vicious! ;) (Winking smiley face to be sure people understand I'm just clowning around)
...
written by ragin_cajun , June 30, 2011 - 09:25 pm
"flicked you in the balls a little"

A little or a lot makes no difference, still hurts the same...it's like a "little pregnant"
...
written by Walter Pierce , June 30, 2011 - 09:31 pm
Don't worry, Dudley, my skin has thickened. Even down there.
...
written by NORTHSIDIAN SHOTGUN , July 01, 2011 - 01:21 pm
You Pilgrims must be very hard up, for no-one speaks so much in sexual tones as you coullies, guys like you talk in a sexual vein veiling the fact that you don't get any, Po-Bet, " The Knights of The Circle-Jerk Table, HAH ! And by the way, its "pisch-nook not flick, flick would be in an endearing manner.......
WAL-Man, Wine is fine
But, really not online
And if your skin is so thick
I'd say you'll welcome the flick
But, should you really want a kick
Why'nt you just flick your bic
You and the other Mo-FO'S
Could attain your main goals
Form a circle ring your bell
Pass the towel around Pell-Mell
And its fine to drink some wine
When you are with your own kind




...
written by NORTHSIDIAN SHOTGUN , July 01, 2011 - 01:22 pm
Oops sorry, the poem is posted Anonymously
...
written by Dudley E. LaBauve, III , July 01, 2011 - 05:01 pm
Rajun_Cajun, 'a little' just seemed funnier to me for some reason. Glad to hear you have a thick ball-carrying case, Walter. Northsidian Shotgun, I don't think a pisch-nook or a flick in the balls is ever endearing. You do make me laugh out loud on almost every post, though.
...
written by Pazan , August 25, 2011 - 07:30 pm
Can we address the most important issue here, while many people willingly want to speak with the press, they may be informed by the police not to speak with the press so that some things do not get misconstrued-sometimes that can happen.

A young man full of life had his life cut short by a brutal and uncomprehensible "MURDER". Can we find out what happened and why so the animals involved can be prosecuted.

Sometimes people are doing the backstroke in a toilet bowl and then they reach out, this young man reached out. Can we help get this family justice?

Hows that for free speach. God Bless the kayaker and God Bless all of the Sonnier Family.

Can the news media help this family??, after all it made quick news that one of the suspects in this heinous crime will not face charges for a knife fight at a night club in 2007 as if that will make him look like an "all around do gooder".........and I could just go on!


...
written by Pazan , August 25, 2011 - 07:33 pm
I dont believe it was a right to speak issue at all. He was shaken I am certain and rightfully so.


You must be logged in to post a comment. Log in using your Facebook account or register if you do not have an account yet.

busy 
Advertisement

Read the Flipping Paper!

Click Here for the Entire Print Version of
IND Monthly
Most Read
Advertisement
Advertisement
in case you missed it