News -> Pooyie!

Pooyie 07.27.2011

Wednesday, July 27, 2011
By The Independent Staff

C’EST BON
When Washington Parish-based Smith Creamery’s dairy plant exploded a couple of weeks ago, scattering debris for miles, the blast should have been music to the ears of Baton Rouge’s Kleinpeter Farms Dairy, Louisiana’s largest family-owned operation. Instead, Kleinpeter President Jeff Kleinpeter and Smith Creamery founder Warren Smith announced a week later that the competitors had entered into an agreement whereby Kleinpeter would take over production of Smith’s milk, half and half, and heavy cream products. When Smith rebuilds, assuming the company chooses to, operations will move back to the Mount Hermon headquarters of the smaller company. So is this just a public-relations stunt by Kleinpeter? Hardly. According to the Associated Press, both companies will earn a profit on the arrangement — Kleinpeter, obviously, for taking over the operation; but Smith will as well because Kleinpeter can package and distribute Smith’s products more cheaply than the smaller operation could before the explosion. And besides, we’ve met Jeff Kleinpeter. He’s a genuinely good guy. Good PR, yes, but good will, too.


PAS BON
When a suspect in a brutal home invasion, robbery and rape failed to show up for his trial last week in Lafayette, it may have been a surprise to District Judge Ed Rubin. It shouldn’t have been. Nineteen-year-old Nelson Chambers of Opelousas is facing an aggravated rape charge and life sentence for the 2009 attack in Lafayette. The day before his scheduled Tuesday trial, according to published reports, Chambers’ two co-defendants cut a deal with prosecutors, agreeing to testify against him in exchange for reduced sentences. Chambers should have been sitting in the Lafayette Parish Correctional Center awaiting that trial, but several months ago, Rubin ruled against the prosecutor, who requested that Chambers be held without bond until his trial date. Assistant D.A. Keith Stutes wanted Chambers held because, Stutes pointed out to Rubin, since his initial release on bond for the rape arrest, the teen was arrested three more times in St. Landry Parish for drug and property crimes, and for failing to appear at court for traffic offenses. The soft-hearted judge countered that Chambers had made all his hearing dates in Lafayette and therefore didn’t pose a flight risk. By press time Monday for this issue of The Ind, Chambers remained on the lam. While hindsight is 20/20, we wish Judge Rubin had a little more foresight.


COUILLON
The town of Wa$hington might be good at catching speeders, but Mayor Joseph Pitre just can’t catch a break. Legislative Auditor Daryl Purpera, according to the AP, reiterated last week that Wa$hington owes the state more than $220,000 for traffic fines it collected on Interstate 49 from motorists busted travelling less than 10 miles per hour over the posted speed limit. A state law designed to clamp down on speed traps like Wa$hington, which pad their meager budgets — in Wa$hington’s case about half its annual budget — requires redirecting the fines to the state when the offense is less than 10 miles over. The town and its beleaguered mayor have tried various means of keeping the cash, namely begging to keep the money and characterizing the law as racist. Pitre’s latest tactic: asking that a member of the legislative advisory council hearing the matter — state Rep. Ledricka Thierry, D-Opelousas, who represents the town of Wa$hington — be recused because Pitre plans to run against her in the fall election.



Comments (4)add
...
written by Gene Broussard , July 27, 2011 - 01:35 am
While I understand that it is wrong that Nelson Chambers did not show up for his trial, we must understand that bond cannot be used as a form of punishment. It is simply a way of assuring that someone shows up for his court hearings when he is ordered to do so. Rubin noted that Chambers had showed up for all previous court hearings, and rightly set a bond and allowed this mans release because that is the law.
...
written by Morrow , July 27, 2011 - 07:19 am
Does a proven flight risk absolutely HAVE to prove to the Laf court he's not going to show up ? Evidently so. And I don't see it as "punishment". I see it as ensuring the accused is in the courtroom for his trial. Now, the community has a very violent man, who is running because there are witnesses willing to testify against him, facing charges in other areas of the state. I know the judge is inclined to give the benefit of the doubt & he sees many young people who turn around. It is the judge's FIRST DUTY to ensure these others, the ones who are a threat to the safety of society, face the court on whatever charges. I've been hearing of more & more home invasions, brazen thugs, breaking in when people are home and subjecting innocent victims to all manner vile treatment. Its time for this judge to come to the realization some people will NOT turn around, DO NOT DESERVE another chance to be violent. Its time for the entire judicial system to come down HARD on criminals. I will be watching to see what this particular thug accomplishes now that he's proven to the Laf judicial system he doesn't deserve to be with the rest of us.
...
written by Smith and Wesson , July 27, 2011 - 09:46 am
Mr. Broussard, I agree that bond should not be used as a form of punishment. However, we elect judges to account for the extenuating circumstances on a case by case basis. I have personally known both the judge and the victim of this case, and nobody wins in this situation. The only way to prevent these events from happening is to scrutinize the personal character of the suspect and this P.O.S. obviously did not deserve to be out on bond. I am no lawyer but being released on bond should have the same implications as being out on parole.

Sidenote: The real only way to prevent these type of events from happening is to stay armed and aware. When these thugs have to consider the immediate consequences to their actions it will deter. I would probably give up hunting if the deer could shoot back.
...
written by Dudley E. LaBauve, III , July 27, 2011 - 02:40 pm
Maybe Pitre should ask Congress for a bailout! What's the deadline date for the town to pay its debt tot he state? ;)
You must be logged in to post a comment. Log in using your Facebook account or register if you do not have an account yet.

busy 
Advertisement

Read the Flipping Paper!

Click Here for the Entire Print Version of
IND Monthly

Read the Dining Guide

Click Here for the Entire Print Version of
IND Eats Dining Guide
Most Read
Advertisement
Advertisement
in case you missed it