News -> Walter Pierce RE:

RE: The Burning Question

Should smoking be banned at bars in Lafayette?
This smoker says yes.
News1

Wednesday, June 20, 2012
Written by Walter Pierce

 I smoke cigarettes. Roll-your-own cigarettes. I am accustomed to huddling near dumpsters and dodging rain to satisfy my nicotine addiction. Because that’s what it is — a chemical addiction, midwifed by a dying myth of sophistication embedded in my psyche by mass media. I have surely trimmed a decade off my life, although I’ve rationalized it by telling myself I’ve shorn off the geriatric years of aching joints, uncomely pustules, incontinence and loved ones dying around me. I’m curing myself of the loneliness and despair of old age. If I could quit smoking and get my 20s back, I’d kick the habit fast.

Yet I’m astonished that our community is debating banning smoking in its last public, indoor bastion: bars. There is no debate. Ban it. Yesterday.

I don’t go to bars often, but I had the good fortune of patronizing a local dive a couple of weeks ago where live music is performed and the customers smoke like a sailor fresh on shore. By “good” fortune I mean sucky. I typically step outside for a smoke when I’m at a bar, even smoker-friendly bars. At this place I didn’t need to: there was enough nico-haze to satisfy my fix — a miasma that burned my eyes and lungs. I’m not exaggerating.

At a forum last week at City Hall, supporters and opponents of a smoking ban at bars made their case. Opponents of a ban marched along the well-worn path of choice and individual rights. An attorney hired by local bar owners — a smart, elegant-thinking gentleman whom I’ve met and respect — argued, “I want my individual choice respected, and I think that’s the fundamental argument. Where does it stop? Are you ready for legislation that prevents you from smoking in your backyard?”

Hyperbole methinks. Where does it stop? It stops at bars, which along with casinos in Louisiana are virtually the only places of business where smoking is allowed indoors. These are places where the public gathers.

(As an aside, I have to wonder whether the bar owners would be lawyering up if they weren’t anticipating some type of legislative action on this issue? There may be more going on behind the scenes than the participants are acknowledging.)

The argument that bar employees including musicians, especially musicians, should simply “choose” to work elsewhere is a stretch, too. Musician/songwriter David Egan, who writes a music column for this newspaper and is a stand-up guy who battled lung cancer, made an indisputable point at the forum: this isn’t a matter of choice for him; musicians go where the work is, and in South Louisiana that work is most often in bars.

My right to smoke in a bar — or anywhere for that matter; why not a day care or hospital? — is also my “right” to subject people around me to something that causes cancer. To help them get sick.

Second-hand smoke is listed as a “known human carcinogen” by the EPA and other reputable groups run by scientists, physicians and people who know a lot of stuff. Second-hand smoke causes cancer. This seems simple.

The American Cancer Society classifies second-hand tobacco smoke in two categories: sidestream and mainstream. The former is the smoke that burns from the end of a cigar or cigarette. It’s much more chemically potent than mainstream smoke — what we smokers exhale — because many of those deadly chemicals are absorbed by the smoker. (You’re welcome.) But their combined effect is undeniably dangerous, especially for bar employees who are subjected to second-hand smoke for hours on end.

Government has a role in ensuring public health and safety. A vital role. Business long ago proved itself more than willing to jeopardize employee health to make or save a buck, especially in low-skill industries where workers are expendable. Construction didn’t self-regulate its use of asbestos and lead paint; the government had to do it. Had it not, construction workers would have been left to “choose” another line of work and consumers to “choose” what their cookie-cutter ranch houses are made of. My apologies for ending that last sentence in a preposition, and for this one being incomplete.

We smokers, most of us anyway, are accustomed to being marginalized, to stepping outside for a puff. We can handle it at bars. We’re ready.

Lafayette has a choice all right. I hope we make the right one.


Walter Pierce
About the author:


Comments (8)add
...
written by Eric Ortego , June 20, 2012 - 05:48 pm
If there was a genuine market demand for smoke-free bars, then some of the bars would already be smoke-free. The fact of the matter is that most of the sort of people who LIKE spending their nights and money in bars are also the sort of people who either smoke, or don't mind the smoke.
This will not help businesses in Lafayette but the surrounding areas ought to expect an increase in bar sales if this goes through.
...
written by Walter Pierce , June 20, 2012 - 06:02 pm
You may be right, Eric. And, being realistic about local culture, the last thing we need is kids driving out of parish so they can smoke in bars then trying to navigate their way back home with a buzz (or worse).
...
written by Dustin Roszell , June 20, 2012 - 06:48 pm
@Eric- Corner Bar is smoke free seems to do very well.
...
written by Robert Ellender , June 20, 2012 - 11:22 pm
I used to smoke but don't anymore. People who want to patronize smoke free bars can go to smoke free bars. Freedom is a precious thing. I also don't agree with Cambridge, Mass. city council who now is thinking about banning soft drinks from restaurants.

I also don't agree with New York City banning big gulps. What is next...? It is a slippery slope.

...
written by Simon Mahan , June 21, 2012 - 04:27 pm
The issue isn't the patrons, it's the employees. They have to breath in hours upon hours of second hand smoke day in and day out. Why should they be forced to work in an environment that isn't healthy or safe? Sure, some smokers may stay home, but just remember: profits don't cure cancer.
...
written by John Bernhardt , June 21, 2012 - 10:22 pm
I certainly miss listening to live music here in Lafayette. I will not go to a bar where there are people smoking. You smell like cigarettes after 5 or 10 minutes. Your coat or sport coat have to go to the cleaners and your health has been compromised or impacted in a negative way. I have noticed the places I go in florida and California are full to the brim and not a cigarette is being smoked. In California they make you stay away from the door as well. I applaud places that put the publics health above fear words like I will close my club or move to a better place. The club will stay open as long as the owner is making money period! We should never let fear keep us at the bottom of any list especially least educated and least healthy. I miss the music here more than words can describe. Yet, CD's keep the memories alive or nights when I stumble into our bands in other parts of the world that place their customers health above fear and the unknown. Thankfully there are more and more progressive places and fewer places that fight this fight for bad health for years before finally maybe maybe giving in to common sense.
...
written by Cameron Grubbs , July 08, 2012 - 07:39 am
@Simon Okay, so I completely understand your point about the employees. Realize first that these employees do not have a right to work at that particular establishment. But also, I will say that there is a valid case that work environments are not as safe as they should be, due to smoke. So rather than ban all people from doing what is still legal to do, and infringing on the rights of the businesses, who employ these people, why not look for some alternative compromise, that allows the businesses to keep their freedom, as well as the patrons, while protecting the health of the employees?

According to the Michigan Restaurant Association in 2010, after having to comply with a smoking ban, 43% of the businesses noticed a drop in business. Now do you think that people would rather be employed, but smelling like smoke, or maybe even wear some filtering mask to prevent inhaling it(should they choose to).... or be unemployed?

...
written by Michael A. Moss , October 05, 2012 - 04:55 pm
Listen, if you don't like smoke in bars start going to church!!
You must be logged in to post a comment. Log in using your Facebook account or register if you do not have an account yet.

busy 
Advertisement

Read the Flipping Paper!

Click Here for the Entire Print Version of
IND Monthly
Most Read
Advertisement
Advertisement
in case you missed it