News -> Walter Pierce RE:

re: Filling in the blanks

I’ve decided to stop funding adjectives and adverbs. They’re not the blank function of brain. I’ll use blanks instead. The blank sector can provide the modifiers. I cannot, should not, be concerned with such trifles. Better to dedicate blank resources to nouns, verbs, pronouns, prepositions and articles. And imagine if you can a blank, weed-blanked parking lot where Parc International now stands, and the cupboards blank at a food bank. 

In less than a week, the Lafayette Consolidated Council will vote on phasing out funding for many of the adjectives and adverbs that make the story of Lafayette sing, i.e., funding for blank organizations like Big Brothers Big Sisters of Acadiana, the Acadiana Arts Council, Girl Scouts, the South Louisiana Educational and Referral Center and Festival International de Louisiane. Summer is when Lafayette Consolidated Government prepares its blank budget, and when the blank angst over funding non-governmental organizations makes its blank migration. If only we could shoot it as it flies blankly overhead. 

By all accounts the ordinance will fail, and that’s a blank thing: NGO funding siphons a blank fraction of 1 percent off the LCG budget. It’s the symbolism that chafes, the notion that roads and drainage and public safety are the end-all of government. 

There are cities where that is the blanking ideology. They’re called wastelands of strip malls, billboards and blanking developments where the inhabitants trudge blankly through their lives of blank desperation, longing to live in a city like Lafayette. We know how to party, we celebrate our culture, we take care of our vulnerable. We are blank like that. 

This is not to say that if the ordinance passed and the blanking $452,000 withered on the vine, these agencies would cease to exist. Some may well. Most would continue to slog on. Blankly, the money accounts for but a blank percentage of each organization’s blank budget. Again, it’s the symbolism here, the saying blankly through the priorities of our budget that aiding the beleaguered and propping up culture are not worth our blank tithes. And it’s blank to presume our churches, civic clubs and corporations have the wherewithal to fill the gaps. 

Even City-Parish President Joey Durel opposes the ordinance in its blank form. Although he vowed to run government like a business (thank goodness he hasn’t — General Motors, Southpark Community Hospital, Catahoula’s Steakhouse — hello?), Durel wants to maintain funding for the blank NGOs like Festival International but cut the funding for those that provide blank services. 

But our mayor cannot have his crawfish and suck the heads, too. These groups are packed together like carp in a barrel vying for the same blank resources fluttering down from above. According to the ordinance as written, as goes one so goes the other. 

LCG has earmarked $2 million to restore greens on public golf courses. Two million. That’s more than four times what we’ll spend to help Faith House shelter, counsel and train blanked women for the workforce, to help Meals on Wheels feed the elderly, to help the Jaycees cover the cost of electricity for Festivals Acadiens. 

If we cannot, even in the blankest way — in a blank act of symbolism — pitch in through our government, we are truly blanked up beyond all recognition.

Comments (7)add
...
written by C. E. LeBlanc , July 15, 2009 - 01:33 pm
_______ right! Well said.
...
written by Cynthia , July 15, 2009 - 07:16 pm
We will have lost all sense of blanking civility if we allow Joey Durel's court of fools to blank the NGOs. Just because many NGOs have not been successful and/or profitable thus far does not mean that they lack merit. I'd put my money on them before the losers at City Hall any day of the week.

Festivals Acadien and Festival International could probably raise all kinds of money if their cash contributions from City-Parish government were to be cut. No one wants to hear that, of course, but it is true. Both festivals are good for local business and will not be allowed to fail.

We should use taxpayer funds to assist the quiet NGOs which in many instances serve tax payers who do not frequent festivals. I personally do not like large crowds. Gatherings like that do not serve my best interests. I like to see people being helped rather than just partying. THAT is how I like to see my tax dollars at work. Crowd control is always such an issue with any large event and is so expensive to begin with. Sure, large events bring in tourist dollars, but therein lies the point. If it is known that the events are going to make money to begin with, why do they need free money from City Hall? Why should we the taxpayers pay to increase the profit margins of Festivals Acadien and Festival International? Don't get me wrong, I LOVE THESE FESTIVALS, but business is business.

If they could borrow money and pay it back, that might be acceptable. Free rides should be over if at all possible.
...
written by California Dreaming , July 16, 2009 - 02:31 pm
If we don't use our public funds wisely, we will soon be in the toilet along with the People's Republic of California.
...
written by give me a break , July 16, 2009 - 10:43 pm
Lordy, i've been listening to this political hogwash for almost 20 years. it's getting a little old.

if the c-p govt is ready to produce the kind of economic development that festival produces, let's see that happen. let's compare the money spent on the "entertainment guru" they hired to what this ordinance seeks to take from festival. then compare the econ impact of both. hello?

if the c-p is prepared to process and feed the homeless who are coming to lafayette whether the council wants them to or not, let's see that happen.

if the c-p can provide info and assistance on the scale that 232-HELP does, let's see that happen.

if the c-p can generate the community cohesiveness, pride and quality of life produced by the Acadiana Arts Council, let's see that happen.

If the c-p can bring the world-class acts to Lafayette that PASA does, let's see that happen.

If not, well, let's see the CPC shut the hell up and write the check. When we look at what we, as a community, are getting for this money, it is simply a disgrace that we are having this conversation AGAIN. it's all politics, and frankly, the cpc is a pack of amateurs compared to people like maria and jackie when you're talking politics.

so, to the CPC: we're tired of telling you EVERY YEAR that we want you to fund these agencies. quit acting like you forgot. Do you want to talk about why these agencies are required to fill in the gaps that you have allowed to exist? I don't think any of you want to go THERE.
Shut up and write the check.
...
written by oldmanriver , July 17, 2009 - 03:07 am
There are folks in this town who are not only proud of there ignorance and assininity, but feel compelled to flaunt it politically. The non-profits in question are mostly old-line organizations with superb track records of service...service that could not, in the main, be provided by government. These two councilmen, thankfully, represent a fringe element.
...
written by M. Leblanc , July 20, 2009 - 06:03 pm
The activities of NGOs is not the problem, the problem is funding by taxes. The first principles of government should be simple and clearly defined. When government expands beyond basic needs—for example, roads and police, to emotionally laden activities like arts, the door is open to fund any activity. The world is full of good ideas but must everyone be forced to pay for them?
...
written by 23 skidoo , July 21, 2009 - 03:07 am
by give me a break: "Shut up and write the check"

Ah, what a wonderful line of reasoning. :)
You must be logged in to post a comment. Log in using your Facebook account or register if you do not have an account yet.

busy 
Advertisement

Read the Flipping Paper!

Click Here for the Entire Print Version of
IND Monthly
Most Read
Advertisement
Advertisement
in case you missed it