News -> Walter Pierce RE:

RE: New Urbanism

There is an undercurrent of class envy in some quarters toward developments like River Ranch. And, indeed, most of the real estate in the traditional neighborhood development is beyond the means of the middle class. But the principles of smart growth applied there — a marriage of commercial, retail and residential space in tight quarters — is key to Lafayette’s future, and to reversing the inner-city decay and suburban sprawl that crept in like mold over the last four decades. From a wider perspective, smart growth, known more grandiosely as New Urbanism, is a prime component in de-stressing our environment and reducing our dependency on foreign oil — on any oil, in fact. Who needs a car when you can walk to work, to a restaurant, to a market, health club or theater?

“It’s a pretty holistic approach to looking at how we live and work and play,” says architect Steve Oubre, whose imprint is etched onto enclaves such as River Ranch, Sugar Mill Pond and — coming in the future to Guilbeau Road — Cafferytown. “It’s very different from a suburban approach where everything is disconnected one from the other — this is a much more connected kind of concept.”

Tightly packed housing, sidewalks, green spaces and public squares clustered around commerce — restaurants, retail, medical and business — is the polar opposite of suburban sprawl and at the core of New Urbanism. It promotes walking and interaction among neighbors. And from an environmental perspective, it reduces dependency on cars, fossil fuels and their attendant pollution. “The basics of what we’re doing is trying to create compact, pedestrian-friendly, mixed-use districts that allow people to conduct their daily businesses as much as possible within one area without absolutely having to engage the automobile.”

The blueprint for New Urbanism — mid 20th century small town America — isn’t new. As a school of thought it was a sort of happy accident that grew out of the development three decades ago of Seaside, Fla., which became the idyllic backdrop for the 1998 Jim Carrey movie, The Truman Show. In seeking to recreate the era of Mayberry — to recapture that sense of community paved over by sprawl and run over by the automobile — Seaside’s developers realized the sustainability of such communities. And Lafayette’s downtown and surrounding neighborhoods are primed for a reintroduction of these smart growth principles. “When you look at the town center, Jefferson Street, the old Freetown for instance,” says Oubre, “these are wonderful examples of early mid-century pedestrian-friendly kinds of places. And there’s a movement now within the city to rebuild those areas.”

Couple that with an upcoming announcement — within the next few weeks, according to Oubre — about an ambitious smarth-growth application to property in the center of town owned by UL, including the university research park and the Horse Farm, and a new and improved Lafayette begins to take shape.

The alternative to rebuilding existing infrastructure and emphasizing density and mixed use is more sprawl, more traffic and less “community” within our community. “The future of our region,” says Oubre, “will be in our ability to focus our growth on infrastructure that already exists as opposed to expending whatever tax dollars we have available on building further and further out. And the hidden costs, which we have not actually understood for a long time, are the costs created with providing those services after those things are built — fire, police, busing, you name it, utilities, it goes on and on; not to mention the loss of some wonderful rural property that as a culture we’re so much about.”


Walter Pierce
About the author:


Comments (4)add
...
written by JOHNSTON STREET MAGNUM , January 27, 2010 - 11:56 am
NEW URBANISM IS ANTI-RURAL, SPECIFICALLY ANTI-AGRARIAN. CONSOLIDATING SERVICES WITH A PREJUDICE AGAINST AUTOMOBILES EXCLUDES PEOPLE WHO DON'T LIVE CLOSE ENOUGH TO NOT CARE ABOUT PARKING.

ANTI-SPRAWL DESIGN IS GREAT FOR PLACES WITHOUT A HEAVY RURAL COMMUNITY - FOR URBAN CENTERS WITH SUBURBAN WORKFORCES, TO DISTRIBUTE CENTERS OF SERVICES AND COMMERCE TO PLACES WHERE PEOPLE LIVE. LAFAYETTE HAS SOME OF THIS, SURE. BUT YOU'RE NOT GOING TO GET FARM AND COASTAL OIL-SERVICE COMMUNITIES TO SUPPORT SPENDING MONEY ON NEW URBANISM BECAUSE THERE'S NOTHING IN IT FOR THEM.

THAT'S THE CONFLICT BETWEEN PEOPLE IN LAFAYETTE AND PEOPLE IN RIVER RANCH/SUGAR MILL - NOT CLASS BUT THE PHYSICAL ABILITY TO PARTICIPATE. IT'S OBVIOUS, IN AESTHETICS AND ERGONOMICS, THAT DRIVING A CAR INTO SUGAR MILL AS A VISITOR MEANS YOU'RE UNWANTED - THAT YOU'RE A TOURIST, NOT A MEMBER OF THE COMMUNITY. IT'S EXCLUSIVE BY DESIGN. APPLYING NEW URBANISM HERE ONLY SERVES TO DRIVE A DEEPER SOCIAL RIFT BETWEEN LAFAYETTE THE CITY AND LAFAYETTE THE PARISH.

WE NEED TO IMPROVE WHAT WE ALREADY HAVE - DOWNTOWN "FOR INSTANCE" - WHICH MEANS IMPROVING PARTS OF TOWN WITH DEPRESSED PROPERTY VALUE, WHICH ISN'T POPULAR BECAUSE WHO MAKES MONEY FROM THAT?!? NOT SOME DEVELOPER WHO WANTS TO CREATE SOMETHING TO MOVE INVESTMENT EVEN FURTHER AWAY FROM LOW-INCOME RESIDENTS!!
...
written by Jason D. Faulk , January 27, 2010 - 05:29 pm
Magnum, interesting thoughts to consider.
I think though, your assessment could benefit from distinguishing New Urbanism in the neighborhood sense, composed of detached single family homes, mixed with some higher levels of occupancy and units per acre, and the application of Urbanism on a truly urban scale.

To highlight this example, I would draw you to the variety of homes seen in classic New Orleans. Uptown, Holy Cross, Lakeview, Gentilly. None of these neighborhoods are as dense as say the Marigny, the Vieux Carre', or the warehouse district, or even downtown high rise condominiums.
The first districts I mentioned are unlike the Bronx, or even Brooklyn, or uptown Manhattan, which are mostly intermediate densities. None of this ponders truly dense urbanism on the scale incompatible with rural lifeways and your coastal oil-service communities.

The real distinction here, is whether the rural is truly rural in nature, or if it to, is merely an even lower density suburbanism endemic to the Acadiana region. If Rural people aren't actually farming, or in engaged in commerce around the core of small towns, then what are they doing that makes their realm and way of life incompatible with the urban areas?

New urbanism has never contemplated excluding the car from the urban framework, but it has sought to de-emphasize it. What we have now is a built-environment with 98.5% car use, and 98.5% unfettered car access.

When one looks at a situation such as UL...not every student can drive there, but many bicycle there and some take the city bus, (and others god yes, walk) because a passive equation is worked in their minds...what will take the longest and be the biggest hassle?
Now UL still accomodates parking, even for a reasonable fee per hour on the campus main itself. This is akin to street-front parking with a meter.

Mostly what we have experienced is a waste of our natural heritage in the form of parking lots. When we get to more integrated land use planning, we will need less parking, sharing more parking areas, and be able to achieve reasonably improved densities of residents, making travel distances shorter, improving the viability of the bus, the UL transport pod, the light rail, whatever it is we get to end up with.
I'll still have a car/truck, I'd just like to drive it less, and be able to get somewhere some of the time not being the wheel.

You are very true I just want to say, that it is a social rift between ways of living. But I do not think we are that far apart. If our city chooses to plan thoughtfully, we will see more agriculture near and in the city, more farmers markets, more small hometown business retailers, etc. We just have to set out to strive for the best.

Here is a link to commentary on the presentation on this topic I listened to in Houston last October.
http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/land_use/2009/10/duany-on-agricultural-urbanism.html

...and the event and video and powerpoint slides itself
http://www.houstontomorrow.org/initiatives/story/agricultural-urbanism/?utm_source=Houston Tomorrow Growth News&utm_campaign=449dcbd6b1-Houston_Tomorrow_Livability_News_110909&utm_medium=email

Here are a few pretty pictures...
http://www.dpz.com/pdf/Project Descriptions/0604-Project Description.pdf

Let's not politicize this any further with cultural dischord.
...
written by Cajunrunner , January 27, 2010 - 08:27 pm
Sorry Walt. Though I don't live on some massive 40 ac. tract, I do enjoy me bit of green elbow room. I don't want my neighbor's house 6 feet from mine.
...
written by northsidian , January 30, 2010 - 02:18 pm
Before they start on new-urbanism how about a sidewalk from the Hilton Hotel to the Blue-Dog. Lafayette is a JOKE!!
You must be logged in to post a comment. Log in using your Facebook account or register if you do not have an account yet.

busy 
Advertisement

Read the Flipping Paper!

Click Here for the Entire Print Version of
IND Monthly
Most Read
Advertisement
Advertisement
in case you missed it