News -> Walter Pierce RE:

Getting It

Wednesday, July 21, 2010
Written by Walter Pierce

A public commitment to funding arts and culture is an investment in us.

I wish I could communicate in print the word “fantastic” with the slight German accent of Acadiana Center for Arts Executive Director Gerd Wuestemann. It sounds more poetic than prosaic, more artsy, and it fits what the AcA’s new theater expansion will be when it opens in October. Fantastic. And beautiful and technically brilliant and, frankly, pretty damn Euro.

Some in our community won’t get it.

When Wuestemann and City-Parish President Joey Durel announced last week that Lafayette Consolidated Government is poised to make a new, bigger commitment to funding arts and culture in our parish, it was met with a shudder of relief by many. The AcA will double in size when the theater expansion is complete, as will its operating expenses. The arts center is a city-owned and -operated facility, and in the most recent budget it had a paltry $34,000 in LCG funding to devote to its operating expenses. That barely covers two months of utility bills.

But last week the AcA and LCG announced a new model: $515,000 earmarked annually for the arts center. Of that amount, $70,000 would go to Festival International and $160,000 would be disbursed among other arts organizations in the eight-parish Acadiana region in the form of grants. The remaining $285,000 would cover the AcA’s utility bill ($190,000), building insurance ($32K), maintenance/repairs ($31K) and sundries. The LCG funding proposal represents just 16 percent of the center’s projected 2010-2011 budget of $1.5 million; the AcA is overwhelmingly self-sustaining through outside grants and fund-raising like this weekend’s Gulf Brew. I use the conditional — would — because the funding model is a proposal; it must still clear the Lafayette City-Parish Council.

There are some who yap and complain that government shouldn’t be in the business of underwriting arts/culture. I invite them to visit one of the drab, forgettable cities that doesn’t support the arts. I would suggest a destination if I could, but those cities don’t make the “best of” lists like Lafayette routinely does — they don’t pulsate on the national radar — so I don’t know where they are. And I’m thankful the naysayers are in the minority, which also appears to be the case with the city-parish council. Last week following the presentation and tour of the AcA, District 8 Councilman Keith Patin gave his blessing to the proposal and said he would support it during the budget process that begins next month. Patin was one of three councilmen who opposed LCG funding of external agencies last budget go-round.

Patin gets it.

It took some guts for our city-parish president to commit himself to this. The economy is stressed and threatened with a severe downturn by the drilling moratorium. If ever there were a time not to make a fiscal commitment to arts/culture — at least from a superficial, knee-jerk perspective — this is it. But Durel admitted at the presentation and tour last week that when he was first elected he “just didn’t get it,” that is, he didn’t consider the enormous return on the investment arts/culture makes to our community in attracting tourism. Tourists have money, and they’re willing to spend it. In our restaurants, our hotels, our shops. But even beyond that practical consideration, which jibes squarely with Durel’s original campaign pledge to run government like a business — smart businesses make investments that generate revenue — the funding speaks to Lafayette’s quality of life, which is harder to enumerate on a spread sheet but makes us who we are.

Before the 1970s Cajun and Creole culture were in retreat in south Louisiana. Public aid to our music festivals as well as a public commitment to French immersion education helped buttress our indigenous cultures. A robust Acadiana Center for the Arts, which underwrites Louisiana Folk Roots and the Louisiana Crossroads concert series, among scores of other cultural offerings flavored by our homemade roux, is a quantifiable source of sustenance.

As a civic body we devote about $4 million annually for parks and recreation — a valid, valuable contribution to quality of life. Half a million for arts and culture is reasonable, too. And at $2.34 per capita, it’s merely average among progressive U.S. cities.

Get it?


Walter Pierce
About the author:


Comments (28)add
...
written by Phil Lank , July 21, 2010 - 06:47 pm
So, so important for so many reasons. Way to go LCG...

PAL


...
written by NORTHSIDIAN SHOTGUN , July 21, 2010 - 08:32 pm
Well i'm really dumbfounded, and only because "PoBet Joey says he doesn't get it! What, did he feel some change hit him in the back, when he left the last meeting with the power crony pals at the CITY CLUB !
The *Naysayers, " THat must be the *ARTSY DEFINITION OF THE lower working class, the peeps who barely can afford a Window Fan....THOSE W/O ONSTAR, WITH WHICH TO FIND THEIR WAY TO THE ARTSY HOTSY MOOSEUM ! The funding for the ARTS, benefits the same, artsy crowd, the Bohemian living Calhouns, with the cutesy EURO`ACCENTO, they are STILL CALLED THE NOUVEAU TRE`S RICHE...GEE, "INDY YOU've now become, "ART PATRONS, you have become like the LOUISIANA WEATHER, mentally vacillating ! I feel like the Lone Ranger when he was surrounded by INJUNS !
...
written by ragin_cajun , July 21, 2010 - 09:09 pm
Get it?! GET IT?! Yeah, I get it Walter. Every month, federal withholding from my paycheck is more than my house note—yeah, I’d say I’m gettin’ it. Since I've bought my house, I have paid more into hairbrained government schemes than the roof over my head and my 2 kids’ education combined--but I could always pay more, right? I pay more than half of every dollar I earn to one government entity or another--but what the hell, it's just money, right?

Yeah, Walter, I think I’ve been “ getting’ it” for quite a while, now, if you know what I mean. Half of the days of my life are spent producing what others will consume--in this particular case, the "arts" and "culture" that YOU will consume. And in order to earn the wages that people like you are so eager to plunder in the name of “quality of life”, I spend A LOT of time WORKING in “drab, forgettable cities” that don’t “support the arts”…. far away from the “culture” of downtown Lafayette. We can’t all get by on tips from tourists, you know. I’m a technology worker. So, until LUS Fiber attracts all those big technology companies to the Digital Bayou, I’ll have to travel elsewhere to ply my trade.

But I don’t want to just “yap and complain”. I’ve taken some advice to heart from others who post their comments here and I’d like to offer something constructive ;-) I want to propose a compromise—tongue half in cheek, of course. :) My solution would satisfy your side and mine at the same time. I have a solution that funds the arts, and the block parties, and the arts organizations of the entire Acadiana region while also sparing the tired overtaxed working people of our city.

Why don’t we cut something else to pay for this? That sounds fair to me! What do you think, Walter? In fact, Walter.....you and Joey Durel and Don Bertrand, and all the concerned arts patrons can pick whatever you want to cut. There is nothing in the entire Lafayette budget that I can think of that can’t be cut—-nothing. Any program, any department is fine with me. Just ONE time, admit that SOMETHING didn't quite work out, and cut the funding.

How about this? Let’s dedicate all the proceeds from the SafeSpeed cameras and vans to the maintenance of the Arts Center! :-0 That’s priceless, wouldn’t you say, Walter? Would you support that?

In all seriousness, it would be a little easier to swallow if this arts funding proposal went hand in hand with a show of fiscal restraint and responsibility in these uncertain economic times. I would hope that someone on the Council would take this up and run with it. I hope William Theriot is reading this. HAHAHAHAHAHA!!! ROTFL!

...
written by Walter Pierce , July 21, 2010 - 09:10 pm
Thank you for that valuable contribution to the discussion, Shotgun.
...
written by Walter Pierce , July 21, 2010 - 09:18 pm
I knew you would jump in on this, ragin_cajun. Government funding of the arts really gets your dander up, doesn't it?
...
written by ragin_cajun , July 21, 2010 - 09:35 pm
:) Walter, I really respect you for writing this, and for posting my response to it. That's character.
...
written by Dot Organism , July 22, 2010 - 12:36 am
Written by Walter Pierce "Some in our community won’t get it."
------------------------------------

Get it? We got it Walter, it is called tax dollars down the toilet to support ruling class hobbies.
...
written by Walter Pierce , July 22, 2010 - 12:50 am
Thank you for that valuable contribution to the discussion, Dot Organism.
...
written by Soop , July 22, 2010 - 12:36 pm
Regardless of whether you ever plan to set foot in the new Arts Center, this is about an investment in Lafayette. Whether you feel this is a liberal, artsy-fartsy organization or not, having a vibrant cultural sector is part of the numerous factors that draw businesses in and in turn draw new people to the area. Studies have proven this. Anecdotal evidence proves this.

Arguing this will have no effect on you is like the folks who argue the loss of gulf drilling will have no effect on them. While I will grant you the effect of gulf drilling is much easier to see than the effect of an arts center (because there will be no mud companies or service companies popping up on the roads leading to the new center), arguing there is no effect is just as absurd. Better facilities brings better performers on a regular basis which raises up Lafayette as a place where "something is always goin on" as a friend of mine from out of town put it. Those intangibles may not be a draw to you but they are a draw to others.

In my opinion, this is a huge return on investment -- even if it does make those artsy-fartsy liberal hippies happy.

All the best,

Soop
...
written by Dot Organism , July 22, 2010 - 12:39 pm
written by Walter Pierce "Thank you for that valuable contribution"
--------------------

Thanks. Nevertheless, when you open the public purse to spending for subjective concepts (i.e. art), and especially limited appealed, you end up with anything being justified. Roads, police, courts, are reasonable roles for government but the arts are not.
...
written by Dot Organism , July 22, 2010 - 02:10 pm
written by Soop , July 22, 2010

"having a vibrant cultural sector is part of the numerous factors that draw businesses in and in turn draw new people to the area. Studies have proven this. Anecdotal evidence proves this."
-------------------------

Highly debatable. Besides, do we want government culture?


"Those intangibles may not be a draw to you but they are a draw to others."
-----------------------------

So what. Why should I pay for other peoples pleasure?


"In my opinion, this is a huge return on investment"
-------------------------------

Questionable and subjective, especially when only supported by opinion.
...
written by ragin_cajun , July 22, 2010 - 02:11 pm
Dot Organism--" you end up with anything being justified"

That's it! LUS Fiber pushed the envelope, and now this seems like it's no big deal. As long as there's some possible conceivable return that MIGHT be realized, LCG should "invest".

Soop--
What are the effects of high taxes and out of control spending? Businesses already try to locate out of the city limits today. Businesses already complain that Lafayette has inefficient licensing and permitting. Fixing that would be a better, and more appropriate, use of the administration's time. May not be as fun, but certainly more effective.

But if you think it's such a great idea, then tell us all what program you would cut in order to have this "vibrant cultural sector"?

This whole debate is backwards.

...
written by Soop , July 23, 2010 - 01:11 am
To Dot -- if the ultimate justification of spending government funds is it must benefit "me" personally, then why pave Gloria Switch Road since I never use it? Gravel is good enough. Why replace the Surrey Street Bridge? I don't go that way. Let Sharon Moss replace it if she wants people to come buy Mercedes and BMWs. Right?

To Ragin, I agree with the point of reducing spending. If I had even a summary of the budget I'm sure I could find some good stuff to cut. But a quick Google search didn't produce that and I don't have time to spend looking for it right now. I think you are on the right track but you want to impose an anti-federal spending template onto local government ... a Republican Nihilism, if you will. And that is fine, that is a perfectly acceptable political point of view. But the heart of that philosophy isn't anti arts center, it's anti government funding anything except police and maybe roads.

Ragin, as conservatives, we were/are supposed to be for what? More local control over spending/rights rather than ceding power and control to a federal government in Washington. Isn't that what this is? This isn't the feds spending money from Lafayette to redistribute to crack addicts in Cleveland and Baltimore. It is Lafayette specnding Lafayette dollars on a Lafayette project. It is conservatism at work even if you don't like the project.

And I don't see how you jump from "Lafayette has inefficient licensing and permitting" to .. so we shouldn't fund the arts center. I seriously doubt the arts center issue has taken up much, if any, of the mayor's time.

All the best,

Soop
...
written by ragin_cajun , July 23, 2010 - 01:29 pm
Soop--

So you dodge the meat of my argument, and nibble at the edges.

"you want to impose an anti-federal spending template onto local government " Yeah, I heard Don Bertrand throw that out in the City Council meeting, too. This "madness in Washington" caused opposition to NGO funding, he said. Same faulty line of reasoning. Always some red herring....

"heart of that philosophy " I've already described my philosophy. http://theind.com/news/6589-ac...rts-center

" I don't see how you jump from....." What I meant was this. You defend the Arts Center as some kind of indirect economic stimulus, claiming it will draw business. I retort that if we seek to encourage business in Lafayette, it would be far more effective and appropriate for the Administration to cut taxes and streamline permitting and licensing.

As for all this "we conservatives" stuff, I think you've lost your mind if you call yourself a conservative and support government funding of an arts center because "Better facilities brings better performers on a regular basis which raises up Lafayette as a place where "something is always goin on"

You should read Edmund Burke.










...
written by Dot Organism , July 23, 2010 - 05:17 pm
written by Soop "To Dot -- if the ultimate justification of spending government funds is it must benefit "me" personally, then why pave Gloria Switch Road since I never use it?"
-----------------------------

Please note, my previous comment to Walter "Roads, police, courts, are reasonable roles for government but the arts are not."

You need to pay attention, Soop. There are plenty things for government to do. The problem is government, the more the government does, the worst things become.

California is a excellent example of government run a muck. In California, bureaucrats are the aristocracy, and labor unions their handmaidens. Of course we have our own in Louisiana, just look at Sally, the unlamented head of Education. She was a vampire sucking the blood of taxpayers.
...
written by NORTHSIDIAN SHOTGUN , July 23, 2010 - 08:28 pm
I have always remained on the side of the have-nots, mainly because i started there, along with quite a few of my present friends ! I REMAIN A HUGE FAN OF A NEWSPAPER WHO REMAINS NEUTRAL, AND THAT IS REALLY ANOTHER OF YOUR STRONG POINTS. YOU " REPORT THE NEWS...LIKE ,WHATS HAPPENING !
UNLIKE THE DUREL KISSING "LAF. DAILY RAG.
I HAVE A HUGE DISLIKE FOR A COMMUNITY THAT DOES NOT PROVIDE A "TENNIS NET ON A CITY PARK PLAYROUND IN A LOW-INCOME AREA, AND / OR A DAMN NET ON A BASKETBALL GOAL IN THE SAME PLAYGROUND..............
I know these children shoved aside with their gameball should be gratefull to have a basketball court, I EXPLAINED TO THEM,THEY SHOULD be grateful !!! I, MEAN THINK HOW MUCH MORE EXCITING IT IS TO HOLLER "SWOOOOOSH WHEN THE BALL GOES THRU THE HOOP, I SAID, "LISTEN THE KIDS IN RIVER RANCH DON'T GET TO HOLLER SWOOOOOSH ! YOU GET MY DRIFT, PALS ?
I'M SORRY WALTER, BUT HOW CAN I CONTRIBUTE TO A SCENARIO WHICH SHOULD REMAIN IN THE "BF BIN WITH THE OTHER JOEY DUREL KISSIN BACKSIDE AMENTITIES FOR HIS WELL-TO-DO CRONYS, AND HIS WELL-TO-DO CRONYS NEIGHBORHOODS Those who get are those who give, PADDING THE POLITICO'S POCKETS !
...
written by Walter Pierce , July 23, 2010 - 08:57 pm
NORTHSIDIAN,
Few if any of the grants the AcA distributes in the eight-parish Acadiana area go to affluent areas like River Ranch. Many of them go to Boys and Girls Clubs and Head Start agencies in economically depressed areas.
It's about spreading art and culture far and wide, not consolidating it in the hands of the elite.

...
written by The Original Northsidian , July 23, 2010 - 11:52 pm
Who cares? I just want everyone to vote NO on the next tax increase that the school board is planning. What say you Tea Party of Lafayette?
...
written by ragin_cajun , July 24, 2010 - 10:20 am
Walter--

" grants the AcA distributes in the eight-parish Acadiana area " -- How can anyone POSSIBLY defend Lafayette City-Parish tax dollars going to fund something outside the City-Parish? Can you not at least agree THAT is wrong?

Is that even legal?
...
written by Nigel , July 25, 2010 - 06:57 pm
I'm a conservative who knows that sometimes you need to spend money to make money. The arts attract a lot of positive attention and tourism dollars to this area. I'm not so partisan that I'm going to advocate a bread and water diet to save city money; where's the return? Nobody goes to Paris to see the infrastructure and public workers. They go to see the Louvre, the Eiffel Tower, the Arc de Triomphe--all structures that wouldn't have been built if the only aim was streamlining expenditures. Pretty damned good investment if you ask me. Or Edmund Burke.
...
written by ragin_cajun , July 26, 2010 - 02:40 pm
Nigel--

You should read Edmund Burke, too then. You think Edmund Burke would have been in favor of government "investment" in an Arts Center, a block party, charity organizations, and arts organizations outside of its borders? I don't. If I'm wrong about Edmund Burke, then show me. Maybe Burke was a left-wing collectivist who championed the cause of government involvement in free markets, too. I don't think he was, but if I'm wrong, then show me.

You're a Conservative, huh? Can you explain what you mean by that? Let's leave Conservatism out of this. Can you explain what you think is the appropriate role of governement in our local economy? Can you give an example of something, anything, that LCG could do that you would say is outside of its scope of authority? Or can LCG do anything at all so long as it's a "pretty damn good investment"?

And is art really a good investment? I can think of better investments with a higher return and much lower risk. Restaurants are an OK investment, and I hear ALOT of people say they come to South Louisiana for the food.

So would you support a move by Durel and the Council to use tax dollars to subsidize "cajun restaurants" in the downtown area, and then JUST A FEW "cajun restaurants" in the 8 parish Acadiana area as well?

Why stop at "arts", and "music"? Food is a HUGE part of "cajun culture". So LCG needs to support our local cajun restaurants with direct subsidies, and LCG needs to fund a new "Cajun Food Center". LCG needs to own and operate 2-3 Cajun Restaurants in the downtown area.

Would THAT be a "Pretty damned good investment" if I asked you....or Edmund Burke?
...
written by Resident , July 26, 2010 - 06:14 pm
I'm with you, Walt, and I think most people are too. Lafayette would not be the place it is now without the local government investment in arts and culture. Fortunately there is a deep well of arts and culture in Acadiana to tap. At $2.34 per capita (what time frame, by the way?), it doesn't seem like a notorious drain on our paychecks.

ragin_cajun likes the equivocation fallacy, raging against the sum total of taxes paid in an effort to criticize this particular bit of tax. Trying to apply the "big government is bad, mmkay" mantra to local initiatives is not a persuasive argument. I believe the federal income tax should be abolished and big spending cuts should be enacted on the welfare-warfare state, but I am 100% behind local funding for arts and culture.
...
written by ragin_cajun , July 26, 2010 - 10:01 pm
I was almost through with this whole stupid debate, but I just can't let that remark go.

Resident--

You are incorrect that I have committed the "equivocation fallacy". My logic is sound. I've looked it up, and the equivocation fallacy is not what you state, and does not apply to my arguments against arts center funding. (I've posted links at the end) Including local tax in my total tax burden is completely logical. Limits are limits, and small transgressions are still transgressions. You're saying that I should turn a blind eye to small taxes and small amounts of govt. spending, but only rail against big taxes and spending amounts? That is certainly fallacious, is it not? "I know this is gonna hurt...but just a little" :) "Don't worry about the bleeding, it's just a little blood" :) I am a slave to the government, based on the amount of taxes I pay and the amount of time I spend earning to pay those taxes, but it's OK, because LCG is just a tiny little shackle in the chain? "The yoke is so light, how dare you protest?" Is that it?

If you can't consistently apply your philosophy, or beliefs, then why bother having them at all?

Instead of trying, UNSUCCESSFULLY, to poke holes in my logic, why don't you answer the questions that I pose that would advance the debate?--what current spending would you cut to have this arts funding? Not one of you will answer that.

And why should we fund arts organizations in 8 other parishes? No one will address that, either.

What is too much? Name something that you think LCG CAN'T do? Where would YOU draw the line? None of you has answered that, either.

And the reason why is because all of you supposed Conservatives out there have dumped your morals at the door of the Arts Center. Whatever political beliefs you have to abandon to have this one inexpensive little treat, so be it--"we need culture". And you'd do it if your were US Senators, too. And that's why this country is where it is today--you have no code that you wouldn't abandon for the right earmark. You're as much a part of the problem as the fiends in Washington you all probably moan about at your Tea Parties. You're all in on it.

So when this passes the Council, what happens if a councilman that was in favor of this runs for Congress? would you vote for him? Would you believe him when he campaigns on fiscal responsibility in Washington after voting for something like this? Believe that he'll go to the mat in Washington to cut "arts funding" at the federal level when he voted for this at the local level? Or will you say, "he may be a welfare state, big government, tax the rich con-man, but at least he's ours!" Will you vote for him because he "brings home the bacon"?

Well, make no mistake, if that comes to pass, I for one will be there to remind the voters of these candidates' records. No councilman who votes for this will be able to run as a "fiscal conservative", or to talk about the "madness in Washington" after having instituted the exact same kind of madness in my hometown.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equivocation
http://www.fallacyfiles.org/equivoqu.html




...
written by ragin_cajun , July 27, 2010 - 12:28 pm
Oil exploration has been an integral part of Cajun Culture for well over 60 years, now. But, oil and gas exploration is on the decline here in South Louisiana.

I think that in order to help preserve our unique "cajun culture" in Lafayette, that city-parish government needs to spend $515,000 per year to fund a city oil company. We all know that oil and gas can be very profitable, and rig hands spend money in restaurants and hotels, so this would be a "Pretty damned good investment if you ask me."...or Edmund Burke...or Joey Durel.

And, although it is government subsidized, don't worry because the Lafayette Oil company would be self-sufficient.

And if you don't support this, you're a simpleton and you just don't "get it".
...
written by ragin_cajun , July 27, 2010 - 07:34 pm
How bout crawfishing? profitable and cultural. LCG should "invest" tax dollars into a "sustainable" crawfish farm, sell the crawfish, or better yet give it away at Festival International.

The tourism boost! The sustainability angle ties in with the Chamber's effort to lobby for green energy. Then the administration could FORCE UL to graduate engineering talent for the crawfish farm.

So LCG is now making money, attracting tourists, preserving the history and culture of crawfish farming in Acadiana, educating "next generation engineers" for the new green energy economy, and saving the planet! This is even better than the "digital bayou"!

I think I'm starting to "get it" now. :)
...
written by Walter Pierce , July 27, 2010 - 07:39 pm
You're obsessing, ragin_cajun.
Step away from the ledge!
...
written by ragin_cajun , July 27, 2010 - 09:32 pm
:) I could go on and on. 2-3 a day for the next week at least :)
...
written by Soop , August 04, 2010 - 07:01 pm
Sorry I missed all the comments but I had to leave for a long vacation and didn't get a chance to reply - not that anyone will probably see this but the fallacy in ragin's Oil Company/Crawfish Business argument is that those are pure businesses that already exist. The basis is not simply "can government make money." I don't like that argument and that is why I was personally against the LUS Fiber project.

I am sure there are some tourists who will come because of the arts but that impact is small compared to the impact of attracting businesses in other sectors because of the fact that Lafayette has invested in the arts which makes this area such a great place once the work day is done.

All the best,

Soop
You must be logged in to post a comment. Log in using your Facebook account or register if you do not have an account yet.

busy 
Advertisement

Read the Flipping Paper!

Click Here for the Entire Print Version of
IND Monthly
Most Read
Advertisement
Advertisement
in case you missed it