Wednesday, September 1, 2010 Written by Walter Pierce
With neither gridlock nor gridiron, the charter commission is off to a dull start.
The Lafayette Charter Commission got back to work Monday after a two-week hiatus necessitated by City-Parish Council budget hearings. Although the meeting took place after this issue of The Independent went to press, and commissioners were scheduled to vote on whether to put a council term-extension proposal before voters by next spring, I can safely say it was mostly another dull but necessary affair — dull because the better part of the first three months of the nine-month process is given over to pedestrian presentations from department heads and other officials delineating the functions and processes of Lafayette Consolidated Government; necessary because, insomuch as the consolidated government beat is mine, understanding the complexities and nuances of the institution is vital. I didn’t know that I didn’t know much about LCG until this commission got going.
Thus far the nine commissioners have heard from City-Parish President Joey Durel and Chief Administrative Officer Dee Stanley on how their offices operate — the chain of command, etc. They also got a shock-and-awe PowerPoint bombardment from Chief Financial Officer Becky Lalumia on the Byzantine financing of LCG — a topic that is as important as it is boring. LCG has multiple bookkeeping accounts, 150 according to Lalumia, and it keeps the finances of city operations and parish operations separate, putting the joke to the C in LCG.
I didn’t know, for instance, that consolidated government’s assets — the buildings, blinds and bulldozers — total $1.7 billion; that’s $8,200 for every man, woman and child in the parish. What the charter commission decides to do about those assets, about this conglomeration, is a pretty big deal. Do we bust it up and return to separate city and parish governments? Do we just tinker with it? The possibilities are many.
There are fewer than 40 consolidated governments in the U.S. — four of them in Louisiana: LCG, East Baton Rouge, Houma-Terrebonne and Orleans, the latter of which was the first in the nation to consolidate more than 150 years ago. Not widely known: Our town, Vermilionville, was able to change its name to Lafayette only after a town called Lafayette in Orleans Parish was abolished when New Orleans and its host parish consolidated.
It’s far too early to discern the constitutional proclivities of individual commission members, so predicting where this process will take us is premature. We’re beginning to get a hint of who might favor repeal of the charter and who will lean toward status quo, but the commissioners have a lot of data to digest in the coming weeks, as do I.
It won’t be until All Saints Day, Nov. 1, when this process starts to really get going. That’s when deliberations begin. Until then, it will be a steady diet of department diagrams and budgets.
A real eye opener of the charter commission meetings so far has been the profound absence of interest by the public, at least as far as the actual meetings go. (The meetings are also televised on Acadiana Open Channel.) Two weeks ago I was one of two media members in attendance, joined by a handful of public officials. The nine commission members could have struck up a baseball game against the audience. Only one member of the general public, as best I could tell, was there. That, my friends, is the sound of paint drying.
My modest proposal for the commission for the next two months is to just talk about football for two hours — NFL, college, hell, I’ll settle for high school. Will the Wreckin’ Rams dominate 5A again this year? Can the Cajuns defy preseason expectations? Did the Associated Press dis the Tigers by ranking them outside the Top 20? Will a short-yardage bruiser emerge from the Saints’ depleted running back corps?
I recognize this will not serve the civic purpose we’ve set out for the commission, but it will make the meetings a lot more interesting.
... written by ragin_cajun , September 01, 2010 - 01:57 pm
I think that repeal and separation is ridiculous and impractical. I think that we need to simplify the "Byzantine financing" so that it is something that the average citizen can understand. If a full-time reporter can't keep it straight, how can a voter? In talking to my city councilman about various things, I can assure you all that they have trouble understanding how LCG works, too. That is unacceptable, and that is what the commission needs to address.
Deconsolidation is an overly emotional panic reaction to a simple shift in demographics. If it happens, it'll cause, or bring back from the past, a whole bunch of other problems, and it will cost ALOT of time and money to do it.
... written by Southsider , September 02, 2010 - 12:07 am
Its my prediction that the status quo will stay the same. I doubt the public even gets to vote on it. That said, why can't the city of lafayette have its own city council, just like the outlying towns, then also have a parish council. that way, for city issues, the city council can vote on it and not have outside interests interring? That way everyones best interests are served. if this can't or won't be done, abolish the towns mayors, city councils, etc. that way, all the parish will truely be consolidated, not the unconsolidated "consolidated" government we now have.
... written by Andrew M. Hebert , September 02, 2010 - 01:59 pm
Walter, there is an error in your calculations. Since City and Parish revenues are kept separate, then, please divide the City assets by only the City population to achieve their worth. And since they are also Parish taxpayers divide the Parish assets by the Parish population. Add that worth to the City residents to achieve a true worth of their separately owned assets.
So in a nut shell, the only purpose of consolidation was to eliminate the City voters from controlling their separately owned tax revenues and assets.
... written by ragin_cajun , September 03, 2010 - 03:51 pm
Andrew M. Hebert--
Flawless logic from you as usual. But I always come walk off scratching my head after I read your posts. I always feel like I'm just missing something--like there's some important piece of the puzzle that I don't have in the history of all this.
If consolidation was such a bad deal for the people living in the city, then why did it ever happen in the first place? Consolidation was not some evil plot pushed on the city by the parish. The city (politicians and people) came up with the idea, proposed it, pushed it through, and ultimately voted on it. There was alot of effort put into consolidation in the 90's, the city had to overcome a lot of ineria and resistance to get it done.....why?
What was in it for the city in the 90's to do this, and what is different now? I've heard this was Ed Abell's brainchild--that true? Was anyone currently involved in City-parish government involved in consolidation in the 90's? What reasons were given for consolidation when it was put on the ballot back then?
... written by Soop , September 03, 2010 - 06:36 pm
The reason for so many accounts is to maintain plausible deniability for our elected officials and so that no one can get an easy "one page" snapshot of LCG finances.
Just like at state level we have a budget crisis every year when actual numbers don't meet the estimates. The logical solution is to base the budget not on forecasts but the real numbers from the prior year. Then you know exactly what you have to spend and we end the constant cycle of budget crises. But they will not do that because it is easier to cut higher ed and hospitals if it is a CRISIS and not just another decision of the budgeting process. They can just blame it on the nameless, faceless economists who got the forecast wrong.
All the best,
Soop
... written by Will it be Politics or Logic? , September 03, 2010 - 08:15 pm
I agree with ragin_cajun - maybe a brief refresher is required; i.e., where are we now, where do we want to be, and how do we get there (from a 90's perspective)? And how does that contrast with the current situation?
Unfortunately, there is a ton of money to be made in "Byzantine financing" and the like. CPAs, Tax Attorneys, Investment Bankers, and numerous others love it. It will be interesting to see if it's unraveled.
Mr Hebert, your analysis and opinions are appreciated: by me, at least... Keep them coming.
You must be logged in to post a comment. Log in using your Facebook account or register if you do not have an account yet.
Advertisement
Read the Flipping Paper!
Click Here for the Entire Print Version of IND Monthly
Is it a crime for citizens to photograph, video, or take notes of a police officer in the line of duty, or a right protected by the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution? Locally, such activity, as witnessed recently, will at the very least result in a night spent behind bars.
David Calhoun and Elizabeth “EB” Brooks are the first two employees of Lafayette Central Park Inc., the nonprofit charged with turning Lafayette Consolidated Government’s 100-acre Johnston Street Horse Farm property into a passive public park. Calhoun was named executive director, and Brooks is director of planning and design.
At Thursday's State of the Economy luncheon, LEDA President and CEO Gregg Gothreaux said PXP has already quietly hired 180 people for its Broussard expansion.
Episcopal School of Acadiana’s Dr. Joshua Caffery, chair of the school’s English Department, is headed to Washington, D.C., and the Library of Congress as the latest winner of the Alan Lomax Fellowship in Folklife Studies.
This year’s Cool Town issue is all about people who are not native to South Louisiana but made a conscious decision to be here, to be among us, to participate in our culture and contribute to it.
A shelved ordinance transferring $200,000 from a northside drainage project to a south Lafayette development may not break any laws, but it stinks to high heaven.
An effort to restore a shuttered dancehall and document other vacant or razed honky-tonks could serve as a model for saving an endangered species of entertainment.
Lafayette’s gene pool has been host to a long line of eccentric characters who have blurred the lines between crazy, genius, disturbed and curiously entertaining.
Deconsolidation is an overly emotional panic reaction to a simple shift in demographics. If it happens, it'll cause, or bring back from the past, a whole bunch of other problems, and it will cost ALOT of time and money to do it.