Wednesday, September 21, 2011
Lafayette’s camera-enforcement program is a major money-maker. The council needs to be party to extending it.
Between an earthquake in Virginia, a hurricane in New Jersey and The Independent agreeing with Councilman William Theriot, signs of the apocalypse abound. But Theriot’s questions — the timing notwithstanding — about Lafayette Consolidated Government’s contract with RedFlex are valid and deserve our attention.
As we know from extensive reporting last week by local news media, the four-year contract with the controversial purveyor of those red light cameras and speed vans was signed in 2007 and should have and would have expired in June 2011 save for a clause in the contract that allows for one-year extensions without council approval. And the administration did just that last spring, arguing when it became an issue that it is not an uncommon practice for contracts of a wide variety. It’s not surprising that this extension would take place beneath the council’s nose: None was a member of the council in 2007 when the original contract was signed.
But shouldn’t one-year extensions of any type of LCG contract without council review be cause for concern? We should have a problem with such an arrangement, although we can draw a distinction between contracts for services only — running wires, digging holes — and contracts for services that generate revenue, especially, in the case of RedFlex, hundreds of thousands of dollars in annual revenue.
Redflex was sold to Lafayette as a means of generating money for traffic-safety programs and changing driver behavior. The former is certifiable, the latter arguable. But now that the administration has begun diverting Redflex revenue to non traffic-safety programs, it is even more a matter of propriety that taxpayers, through the council, have a transparent (re)view of this program. The RedFlex revenue dynamic changes the complexion of this discussion a good deal.
Into the fray has stepped former Lafayette assistant city attorney Lester Gauthier, who after reviewing the RedFlex contract and the Lafayette Home Rule Charter, decreed over the weekend that the contract was improperly extended. Gauthier, it must be noted here, is a member of the Lafayette Parish Democratic Executive Committee, and a fellow committee member, Mike Stagg, is seeking to unseat Durel on Oct. 22. There’s your grain of salt. But Gauthier’s argument is well-reasoned and well-researched, regardless of its effect on an election that Durel will almost certainly win walking away.
These one-year extensions of contracts are especially troublesome because they appear to make LCG contracts open-ended and, most important, vulnerable to corruption and cronyism.
If contracts such as RedFlex are as the administration portrays them, then short of a new council policy mandating review at the expiration date, can’t the city-parish president, in this case Durel, extend the contract again next year? And the next? And the next?
Presumably Durel’s successor can do the same, making that four-year contract inked in 2007 a perpetual covenant impervious to taxpayer review.
Assuming Durel is re-elected on Oct. 22 — a safe assumption — he will have four more years in office as C-P president. But what about the person who follows? Can we not imagine a politician with fewer scruples than Durel turning one-year extensions of lucrative contracts into a tidy little kick-back arrangement? I most certainly can.
We’re willing to give Durel a mulligan on this one; he’s arguably done nothing in his eight years in office to suggest this was nefarious or malfeasant. But next year the council needs to be part of the discussion. It should have been this year, and may well yet when the budget is finalized next week.
And the council should adopt a policy mandating that contracts — at least those that generate revenue and especially those that are controversial — be reviewed when their expiration date draws near.
As part of a national undertaking known by industry insiders as the “Butterfly Project,” a rebranded version of The Daily Advertiser is set to launch with Sunday’s edition of the Gannett-owned paper.
Louisiana moved up a slot to 48th in the ranking of healthy states — once again, thank God for Mississippi! — so all this frettin’ about Gov. Bobby Jindal’s refusal to expand Medicaid per Obamacare ... fuggidaboutit! We don’t need Medicaid no more!
The Denham Springs woman who placed Christmas lights in the shape of a butter finger on her roof in a display of anger directed at neighbors has doubled the trouble for the 2013 holiday season.
The New Orleans architect behind the 1984 World’s Fair also left his mark on Lafayette.
Laid back vibe just right for NOLA Bowl
The 30-second commercial, to run around the state, is the Democratic senator's first TV spot in her bid for re-election to a fourth term.
It's a number that has edged up but falls far short of the thousands who are eligible for subsidized coverage.
A group of mostly higher education leaders will make recommendations to state lawmakers about how to tweak the policies governing tuition rates charged at the state's public colleges.
Week long specials and a ribbon cutting celebration held in Parc Lafayette
Here's your daily look at late-breaking national and international news, upcoming events and the stories that will be talked about Wednesday, December 11, 2013
Fort Worth company's new facility at Lafayette Regional Airport will build helicopters primarily for the export market.
Could River Ranch restaurant be the next star?
Move over Hooters — there’s a new breastaurant coming to town.
Hashtag, retweet, like, share and do whatever else it takes to get in good today with the jolly man in red.
That would be Congressman John Fleming talking about Sen. David Vitter.
The alleged mastermind behind the bribery scheme that went on for four years under DA Mike Harson’s nose isn’t just schizophrenic, bipolar and recovering from mini strokes; he now says he has cancer.
Louisiana's higher education leaders are trying to work out a financing deal to keep the state's public colleges from running low on state cash to operate their campuses.
With their latest triumph, the Saints left little doubt about how tough they are to beat in the Superdome. Unfortunately, two of their remaining three games are on the road.
The festival is scheduled for March 21-22 in New Orleans.
NOLA Bowl ready prints