News -> Walter Pierce RE:

RE: Happy Again

Wednesday, November 16, 2011

Outgoing District 6 Councilman Sam Doré lost badly on Oct. 22. He couldn’t be more thrilled.  By Walter Pierce

It seemed last Tuesday on the patio at Legends on Bertrand Drive as City-Parish Councilman Sam Doré endorsed District 6 hopeful Jared Doise, that Doré wasn’t so much passing the baton to the candidate he hopes will succeed him on the council as he was tossing a hot potato to the nearest shmuck. I don’t mean that Doise is a shmuck, but it was clear that Doré was relieved to begin disburdening himself of the councilman’s mantle, which had become more of an albatross during his truncated term on the council.

I had an advantage in this observation: I learned of the impending endorsement from a source and had spoken to the councilman on Monday before the announcement at Legends. He made it clear then that being a politician wasn’t exactly a rewarding experience. It sucked, in fact, and it was festooned with ribbons on Oct. 22 when Doré came in third among the three candidates in the District 6 primary. He was the only incumbent to be bounced from office and arguably not the most deserving of the ignominy.

“The Saturday night [of the election] I didn’t know what to think; it was six months culminating in that event,” he recalled on Monday. “But when I woke up Sunday morning and realized it was over for good, that I didn’t have to, A) campaign any more and, B), I didn’t even have to show up anymore, it was the best feeling I’ve had in four years, and I’m telling you every day that goes by it’s sinking in more and more how happy I am. What a relief it is.”

Sam Doré is a poster child for being careful what you wish for. He wanted to be on the City-Parish Council. Badly. Then he was on the City-Parish Council and he hated it.

He ran in 2007 as a Democrat against incumbent Bruce Conque, coming in a distant second in a three-man field with 35 percent of the vote. Conque cruised to re-election without a runoff, generating 57 percent. But about a year later Conque resigned to take a job with the chamber. Doré had his opening. He switched to Republican and in April 2009 ran first among three candidates in a special election. A month later he beat Max Jordan in the runoff to secure his seat on the CPC.

Doré is a nice guy, and he clearly underestimated how thankless a councilman’s job can be.

Five months after the runoff this newspaper gave him a D — the lowest grade awarded among the nine councilmen — in a cover story grading each pol’s performance. We referred to Doré as “the least engaged” and observed, presciently, that “[h]e doesn’t seem thrilled with governing.” Welcome to politics, Sam.

The relief of concluding this 2.5-year ride on the council was evident in his voice when we spoke by phone before the Doise endorsement.

“Have you ever had a close person to you die and you’re all shook up about it, but each day that goes by it gets a little better?” he asked rhetorically. “That’s what I’m feeling like: I’m a little happier each day and the further it gets back in my memory that happier I get.”

In working out the timing for his endorsement, Doré was kind enough to impart a hard-earned lesson to the would-be politician: “I had this talk with Jared. I told him I hope you win because I know you want it really bad. But as a friend I hope you lose, dude, cause it’s not good, it’s not fun, it’s not honorable, it’s not public service and all the other things you think it is.

“All it is is rotten, and nobody appreciates anything you do. It is not a thankful job. It’s just not a fun thing at all; your whole family suffers, everybody around you suffers, you turn into an ugly person — I know I did. I turned from a happy person to an unhappy person, and now I’m happy again.”


Walter Pierce
About the author:


Comments (27)add
...
written by Compassionate One , November 16, 2011 - 01:12 pm

Interesting story. I think Sam is truly a good person, but not cut from political cloth.

"it’s not honorable, it’s not public service and all the other things you think it is"

I would have to disagree. But you have to have a backbone to stand up to the political powers and focus on your district, serving the people who put you in office.

I'm glad you're happy again Sam, and I wish you the best!



...
written by ragin_cajun , November 16, 2011 - 03:45 pm
If we take him at his word, and we believe him when he says how bad it is, then that begs the question....why would the other councilmen stay? You've got 2 ideologues (Theriot and Bellard) who stay on for ideological reasons. Why are the other 7 enduring this?

What about the incumbents who just ran for and got another 4 years? Bertrand, Patin, Shelvin, Boudreaux, all got re-elected, right? Not exactly ideologues, so what's in it for them?

Can't be the money, I've already been excoriated for saying that they council is overpaid. They work so hard, all those meetings, always have to dress nice, all the calls....why?
...
written by sara smiles , November 16, 2011 - 05:57 pm
This article blows me away. I chalk it up as someone who's a poor and sore LOSER!
Why the heck did he run for re-election if it was so BAD for he and his family!
To the 2 guys left in the race; Good luck. At least our district will have someone who WANTS to do the job.
...
written by D. Veillon , November 16, 2011 - 07:35 pm
It dissappoints me that he would endorse "Jared Doise" for his office, unless of course he really knows who Jared Doise is, meaning a self servicing, egotistical cut throat, and thinks his constituents will miss his leadership for the next go round...
...
written by Gene Broussard , November 16, 2011 - 09:09 pm
Sara: I'm also somewhat confused by him running again. Especially after seeing hinm say how bad it was to be a councilman but I don't think this means he's a poor or sore looser.


D. Veillon: I sure don't understand what you wanted to say. Do you?

...
written by Joe Politico , November 17, 2011 - 02:15 am
The real problems is not the politicians but the political system under which they operate. My councilman Shelvin who I think is not capable of being a good councilman but he had enough of a political machine in place to win re-election. Dore while apparently not happy with the job was faced with two opponents....one a Tea Party backed ideologue and a fresh face on the political scene which was apparently enough to push him out of office. Not because he was a bad councilman but apparently one who did just what he had to do to get by...which is not enough this day.
So lets look at the make up of the council as it stands...we have Shelvin whose ability to manage his business lifestyle in question, Theriot and Bellard who are ideologues who feel that government should be run like a business which is not its purpose. Its purpose is to deliver the best possible services available based on the budget available. Boudreaux I don't think he actually knows what he stands for and Bertrand I feel is just trying to do the best he can to move the city in the right direction based on the sources he has available.
Look at the bigger picture and take into consideration the friction and inability to work towards one goal that goes on at a national level and just look at this as a more localized version....
...
written by the original northsidian , November 17, 2011 - 12:45 pm
Bertrand is just trying to drink the kool-aid without choking! Ask the folks in Bendel Gardens where he stands on their list?
...
written by nothing to do , November 17, 2011 - 01:13 pm
I find this to be one of the funniest stories to be printed in this paper. Makes no sense to me. He says he is glad to be out, he didnt like it, it was a thankless job. Sure it was, he didnt do what he was elected to do. Nothing to thank him for. Durel and the other cronies I am sure thanked him. I'm sure they thanked him a lot. But wait let me do one more thankless and useless thing before I leave. Let me go get my free drink at a bar endorse someone I dont want to win. This is really insanity at best. I watch guys I know get into politics, good honorable smart guys/girls get into this arena and become someone they are not. They sell their integrity, honesty, and pride to get something they want so bad and for what. To sell out to the sharks that have an agenda and play thier game. With regards to work (which this is a job) I am resposible to the people I work for. Not my co-workers. I am peaceful happy and content when the Person that hired me and pays me is pleased with my performance and ethic. A lesson I learned the hard way. I wont make a plea here for anyone. I will say that Honest hardworking ethical people make the best politicians, not liars corner-cutters and self-serving people. This country is going to hell because of these kinds of people. I dont want anyone in office that is good at campaigning, I want someone good at the job for which they seek. If you work for me and dont do the job I hired you to do I really don't need you. This is the case here. Plain and simple. If you didnt like it resign, if you want some thank you go help the poor, or the homeless, either way the problem stands in the mirror.
...
written by ragin_cajun , November 17, 2011 - 04:04 pm
Following "nothing to do", the job is voting according to the wishes of the citizenry, voting for policies that are good for society, and responsibly balancing those two things when they are not in agreement. The way that informed citizens choose which person will do that best is by figuring out what criteria, or values, or priorities, the politician uses to make decisions about what is best and what is good.

To know that about a person, you have to understand their worldview, philosophy, or ideology. Read this next time you hear someone complaining that so and so is ideologically driven. Politics is philisophy, and to choose a practitioner, you should choose based on their philisophy. What kind of citizen are you if you vote for a politician but cant identify their philosophical beliefs. What kind of politician are you if you won't state your philisophy to the voters?

Yet, commenters here routinely admit their ignorance of their councilman's belief system.
...
written by Southsider , November 18, 2011 - 09:16 am
A councilman should vote on what he believes is best for his district and the parish as a whole, NOT what the citizens want. After reading many comments not only regarding this article but many more as well, my comment should drive the point home.
...
written by ragin_cajun , November 18, 2011 - 04:43 pm
"A councilman should vote on what he believes is best for his district and the parish as a whole, NOT what the citizens want. "

That is called oligarchy. If your council was pared down to only one member, then it'd be a monarchy. But, the United States is a republic, and the US Constitution has a line in there about guaranteeing all states a republican form of government.

Elementary political science. Sheesh....

Comments regarding articles do not constitute evidence to support your point. How does that drive anything home?
...
written by ?????????? , November 18, 2011 - 06:32 pm
ragin_cajun is absolutely correct.

I vote for my "representative" to "represent" me and my beliefs. If he starts voting as "he" believes without regard to my opinions, he is no longer representing me and I will look for a new representative.

If you wish to express your opinions on an issue to your representative, he must be willing to listen to you. That representative must be open-minded and interested in your opinion on the issues rather than closed-minded or so "opinionated" or "ideological" that "your" opinion doesn't even matter.

How do these 2 candidates measure up ???????

...
written by nothing to do , November 18, 2011 - 07:34 pm
I diagree with some of the comments made. I vote to elect someone to be my voice in the forum in which he is elected to. Not what he or she believes. I frankly dont care about his beliefs. I think this candidate should listen to the voices of his constiutuents, not the one in his head. I mat not know a lot about politics but i know that if i am hired to do a job my boss really doesnt concern himself about what i believe or what i think is best he is the boss period. that grey area in between is called polotics and frankly is sending this country into ruin. This idea of when in Rome well move to Rome and do that there. How do they measure up to me. Well I would rather heasr about what You did rather than what you heard the other guy did. I would rather a man get on tv and say this is what i have done and will commit to do. If you want to tell on the other guy go to day care and hang out with the kiddies. thats the place for that. Grown men don't do that.
...
written by nothing to do , November 20, 2011 - 12:09 pm
Well here it is Andy has won with a fairly comfortable lead. A clear message has been sent to the others and Mr. Doise should have taken a lesson in polotics. Sadly enough he did so well until he got hooked up with the dead beats hopefully he sees the errors and lerarns from them. As for Dore' we no longer need you for anything.
...
written by The Queen in the Game of Life! , November 21, 2011 - 05:40 am
I must agree with you "nothing to do". I appears that your name does not fit you. You should change it to "commenting alot because I have nothing to do". LOL. Your comments were well written and received!
...
written by Southsider , November 21, 2011 - 11:50 am
Jesus RC, i sure wish i was smart like you. but lets use camillia blvd. as an example. Was it best for the parish and city to have the road built? I'd have so say yes. Would i want to be displaced because of a road? I'd say no. Sometimes what you believe in isn't whats best and the councilman has to be that decision.

Did i do good?
...
written by the original northsidian , November 22, 2011 - 04:26 pm
Southsider: The Blvd. you speak so highly of was built for one reason. To enhanch the value of River Ranch. Even Ray Charles can see that!! Ride that Hamster, Hamster!!!
...
written by Southsider , November 22, 2011 - 07:53 pm
OS what are you talking about?
...
written by Southsider , November 22, 2011 - 10:10 pm
I guess the river crossing was a last minute deal done between the city and the developer to enhance RR? Hmm..i seem to recall that the city had been wanting to cross the river since May 1964. Ray can see, he isn't blind in this case, hamster.

Here is the link idiot:

http://www.lafayettela.gov/publicworks/dpt530camelliatimeline.asp

...
written by Southsider , November 23, 2011 - 12:34 pm
Oh and there is the perfect example of why a councilman must make a decision himself instead of listening to the people. See the above statement concerning the Camillia Blvd/RR enchancement by ON
...
written by the original northsidian , November 23, 2011 - 11:20 pm
Southsider: Why would you call someone who disagrees with you an idiot. My, my you would actually get your sissy ass kicked on the Northside for saying that. Grow up bro!! Walter Comeaux pushed for the bridge because he was a developer and had land on Albertson Parkway where the road connects. He also did everthing he could to help his developer friends. Do you actually think that deal (River Ranch) would have been profitable without the Blvd.? So maybe, just maybe it is t-wa who is the idiot. My suggestion to you. Try drinking beer instead of the kool-aid!!
...
written by the original northsidian , November 23, 2011 - 11:45 pm
Walter: If you want to edit my last comment you can. I was probably a little rough on the Southsider. You see on the "side" we had to fend for ourself. And that is when the streets come rushing back in our minds!!One day I will stop by your office and introduce myself.
Have a Happy Thanksgiving!!
...
written by the original northsidian , November 24, 2011 - 12:16 am
Southsider: Before Walter Comeaux there was Kenny Bowen. He wanted the Blvd. bridge so bad he talked about it on his death bed. He requested the bridge be named after him. Were you living in Lafayette when the Amb. Caffery bridge ended in a field? Do you know who owned the field? Now the roads and bridges helped the land owners get rich & richer. I am just stating facts. The politicians could care less about you unless you happen to be in the clique. If you did go to school, which I assume you did. What was taught to you in Civics class? Was it the people we elect vote for what they think is best for us. If you believe that you probably failed Civics. Please grow up and quit calling people names who disagree with you. One day you may run across a northsidian and say the wrong thing. And yo mama won't be able to watch ya back!!
...
written by Southsider , November 24, 2011 - 09:51 pm
I usually don't resort to calling someone a 'name' as it degrades a persons comment, but sometimes i get really tired of being called names by the same person over and over again hence my 'ugly' reply. Again, as you can see in his/her comment(s) he has a chip on his shoulder. I have lived on the northside, but decided to educate myself and get out that ghetto for the betterment of my family and myself. Sorry, but my comment regarding what a councilman must do instead of listening to people isn't popular, but sometimes hard decisions must be made against what some people think is best for the whole community as was the case of Camillia Blvd. Camillia Blvd was in the works for many, many years before it was finally completed. See the above link. Yes, it made the developer money, so what? Why the animosity toward a developer is beyond me. You wonder why the Northside has a stigma about it? Read what Orgi North writes most of the time. There is the answer. Good luck with Pierre too. "Upper Lafayette" deserves him.......
...
written by the original northsidian , November 25, 2011 - 12:25 pm

Southsider: You take my comments to seriously. I guess while you lived where it never floods you didn't learn to play the Dozens! But, guess what? I really do agree with you sometimes. I just can't understand how you can march to the band. You see bro, I always marched in the opposite direction. And the animnosity is not toward the developer (I would love some of that action!). It is only the clique that know what is going on(ie. garbage transfer station, etc.) Also what do you think about prime time property being appraised as farm land? Are you a Chamber of Commerce member? I might know you.
...
written by the original northsidian , November 25, 2011 - 01:28 pm
Southsider:Do you have me confused with the Northsidian Shotgun?
...
written by Southsider , November 25, 2011 - 09:56 pm
I'm not a CC member. As far as the ag loop issue, i've given The IND at LEAST 2 areas multiple times where I know the families are getting ag status and shouldn't be, but have yet to see them exposed. Its plain as day on the tax assesor property search website.
You must be logged in to post a comment. Log in using your Facebook account or register if you do not have an account yet.

busy 
Advertisement

Read the Flipping Paper!

Click Here for the Entire Print Version of
IND Monthly
Most Read
Advertisement
Advertisement
in case you missed it